Our process

We start with the firm’s official website, rules, terms, pricing, documentation, and public dashboards. We record the date checked and link back to the source wherever possible.

We separate published facts from our interpretation. If a rule is unclear, pages disagree, or a number varies by asset, we say so instead of filling the gap with an assumption.

Prices, leverage, markets, payout terms, and identity requirements can change. A Worth Knowing page is a dated research snapshot—not a permanent statement of a firm’s terms.

Worth Knowing Fit Score

Our score is a clarity and beginner-fit score, not a profitability rating or prediction. It is calculated out of 100 using: rule clarity (25), risk-rule simplicity (20), payout clarity (15), fee accessibility (15), market access (10), beginner fit and practice support (10), and research confidence (5).

Scores receive an absolute letter grade as well: 90–100 A+, 85–89 A, 80–84 B+, 75–79 B, 70–74 C+, 60–69 C, and 0–59 D. The tiers are 85–100 Strong fit, 75–84 Worth a look, 60–74 Read carefully, and 0–59 Limited public clarity. A higher score means the public information is easier to understand for the stated use case; it does not mean the firm is safer, more profitable, or right for every trader.

What our labels mean

Reviewed means we found public source material and checked the listed facts. Needs attention means the public pages contain an important uncertainty, conflict, or limitation. Not stated means we did not find a reliable public answer.

What we do not do

We do not promise payouts, recommend a specific account for every trader, or present simulated evaluations as guaranteed employment or income. Visitors should read the current official terms before paying.